New World OrderBecause I was afraid that I would appear as a conspiracy theory nut, I have hesitated to produce an article on this topic, but I feel it's necessary to warn the few people that do visit this website.
My concerns are based on 5 facts (one of which being somewhat uncertain). Please read them carefully and connect those 5 dots. Then you will share with me my concerns for our nation and for those who are lost at this time.

Barack Hussein Obama1. There are legitimate reasons to believe Mr. Obama is not eligible to be the President of the USA under the constitution.
 This allegation is based on a few facts:
  1. The US constitution Article 2 Section 1 states:
    No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President

  2. There have been numerous lawsuits to demand that Mr. Obama prove his eligibility for POTUS. Yet, he has chosen to have the courts dismiss those cases based on technicalities rather than producing his original birth certificate to prove his eligibility. Why does he hid his birth certificate if he is eligible?

  3. A democrat, Mr. Philip J. Berg stated in his lawsuit: "If in fact Obama was born in Kenya, the laws on the books in the United States at the time of his birth stated if a child is born abroad and one parent was a U.S. Citizen, which would have been his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama's mother would have had to live ten (10) years in the United States, five (5) of which were after the age of fourteen (14). At the time of Obama's birth, his mother was only eighteen (18) and therefore did not meet the residency requirements under the law to give her son (Obama) U.S. Citizenship much less the status of 'natural born.'"

  4. Mr. Obama's paternal grandmother has confirmed that she was present when Mr. Barack Hussein Obama Jr. was born in Kenya.

  5. A Kenyan government official confirmed that Barack Obama Jr.'s birth place in Kenya is well-known.

  6. Mr. Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981. At that time, US passport carriers were not allowed to enter Pakistan. He must have used his Indonesian passport (ie he was not a US citizen at the time). To collaborate this explanation, Mr. Obama has refused to release his college education records, which would have revealed his foreign citizenship at the time.

  7. Mr. Obama's half sister (Maya Soetoro) has stated that he was born in two different hospitals

  8. Mr. Obama's mother was later re-married to an Indonesian man, and Mr. Obama attended an Indonesian public school under the name "Barry Soetoro." At the time, the Indonesian law did not permit a non-Indonesian citizen to attend Indonesian public schools. Furthermore, Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship at the time. A document exists that states that Mr. Obama was an Indonesian citizen under the name "Barry Soetoro." The only reasonable conclusion is that regardless of Mr. Obama's original citizenship status, he must have lost his US citizenship (if he had it at all) when he and his mother moved to Indonesia. Therefore, if Mr. Obama is a US citizen at all (he may not be), he must have gone through naturalization process. You can see his Indonesian school record here.

  9. The Obama campaign produced a "certification of live birth" (COLB) for Mr. Obama. However, at the time, the state of Hawaii gave such documents even to foreign-born babies. It is not the same as a birth certificate. Factcheck.org, who has allegedly "proved" Mr. Obama's eligibility, has not disclosed its conflict of interest.

  10. The COLB by the Obama campaign has been shown to be a forgery.

  11. Donofrio's lawsuit rightly alleges that even if Obama was born in Hawaii as his campaign has stated, he is still not eligible under the natural born citizen requirement clause since he was a dual citizen; his father (a British national) would have transferred his nationality under the British law at the time of Mr. Obama's birth.

Illuminati Pictures Logo 2. Much of the media support for questioning Mr. Obama's eligibility for POTUS came from Illuminati Pictures.
I have read a comment posted on Catholic Media Review and verified the information myself. Accordingly, Illuminati Pictures' website (they have a separate public website here) is produced by Spyder Web Developers (SWD). SWD is registered to Ric Swiner, who has close ties with Sinclair Braodcast Group (SBG). SBG owns Fox, CBS, ABC, and NBC.

In other words, Illuminati Pictures practically belongs to SBG. 3 of the 4 networks SBG owns (you could say all four) heavily supported Obama during the election cycle. That appears to be internal conflict of interest, doesn't it? My educated guess is that SBG's goal does include all these seemingly conflicting endeavors, namely to help get Mr.Obama elected and then to reveal his ineligibility.

*The Illuminati Pictures logo shown above means something like "truth" in Japanese and Chinese.


Roman Catholic Church 3. SBG connection to Roman Catholic church?
First of all, there was that link I had in point number two. There seems to be mutual interest between Illuminati Pictures and the Roman Catholic church (RCC). This is just a stipulation, but Illuminati Pictures seems to be the kind of organization that would share some philosophy with the Illuminati.

I could not find the citation for this information, but I have either read or heard from somebody recently that representatives of Catholics, Lutherans, Muslims, and Hindus meet annually to discuss unification of all those religions towards "One world religion." I'll post the reference as soon as I can find it, but this is a good article to read. Both Illuminati Pictures and RCC seem to very Christian. However, remember that the Bible states that there will be a one world religion under the antichrist (and by definition, a religion must appear "good" to men). So the link between SBG and RCC is significant in that regard.


Soldiers marching in US 4. Pentagon to deploy 20,000 troops for domestic matters
According to Washington Post, Pentagon is planning on deploying 20,000 troops on US soil by 2011 to be able to deal with domestic threat. Now I believe the key words in the article are "by 2011," which means that they are already working on this.

The timing of this decision is intriguing. Why now? Why here? Does the government know that there will be trouble within US soon? Is this, as they say, just for "terrorists"?


Christ Second Coming 5. The Lord's second coming is near, which means the Tribulation is near as well.
It is apparent that if indeed Mr. Obama is shown to be ineligible for POTUS by somebody like the US Supreme Court, there will be massive riots (~4 million people may attend Mr. Obama's inauguration) in the US. It is possible that that will lead to something like the Civil War or collapse of the US government as we know it. Whether we like the idea or not, one of the factors that prevented those countries that hate the USA from invading the US soil was the US government and its military might. With the collapse of the US federal government, it will be possible that other nations will try to claim the US soil, triggering another world war. Whoever would win that war would be both evil and extremely powerful. Such is a likely scenario in the end times with regard to One World Government (winner of the WW III + the Illuminati), One World Commerce (SBG, etc), and One World Religion (Catholic, Muslim, Hindu, etc combined). See Revelation Chp. 17-19.

Now this scenario assumes that the USA will not be a major role player in the end times. I know that many Christians have historically felt that the USA would play a major role in the end because the country was founded upon Christian principles and because the USA, as of now, is a superpower nation. However, as a nation, America has gone extremely secular and immoral: evolution vs. creation issue, gay marriage, abortion, no God in schools, etc. Also, the Bible teaches us not to assume that current situations will remain the same in the very end of time. The following are good Scriptures to read.
Then the word of the LORD came to me, saying, O house of Israel, cannot I do with you as this potter? saith the LORD. Behold, as the clay is in the potter's hand, so are ye in mine hand, O house of Israel. At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy it; If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them. And at what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it; If it do evil in my sight, that it obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them. Now therefore go to, speak to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, saying, Thus saith the LORD; Behold, I frame evil against you, and devise a device against you: return ye now every one from his evil way, and make your ways and your doings good.
(Jeremiah 18:5-11)
Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. (2Peter 3:3-4)
Let us not be like the scoffers in the last days.

Although I am not sure of its authenticity, there is a "prophecy" circulating among some Christians that predict such a scenario. I'm not recommending that you take this as words of God, but it is definitely an interesting read. If more of these events happen as outlined in the "prophecy," then we should really take it to heart and turn our eyes to the one and only God, who is merciful. Praise God for His Son Jesus Christ, our Saviour!

Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

Posted by tak, filed under history, political, news, bible-notes. Date: December 6, 2008, 6:29 pm |

7 Responses

  1. Ted Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 6:53 am

    The choice facing the Supreme Court boils down to civil unrest to protect the Constitution or civil war to proceed to ‘inaugurate’ a non-”natural born citizen”.

  2. Tak Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 7:49 am

    Ted,

    Thanks for your comment. Sadly, you may be right that whatever decision the Supreme Court makes, we may face a violent time. However, I do think that there’s more chance of massive violence if Mr. Obama is prevented from his inauguration. Some of the military would support Mr. Obama even if the Supreme Court decides in the constitution’s favor because they would think “Barack Obama was elected by the people.” Thus creating a conflict between some civilians + constitution-loyal military and Obama-loyal military. And if he does get sworn in, I’m not sure that the military will have the guts to go against the inaugurated commander-in-chief. Without the backing of at least some of the military, it wouldn’t be a huge conflict. My 2 cents.

  3. The Intellectual Redneck Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 9:31 am

    This is the most thoughtful and coherent comment I have read on this issue. I wish I had written this comment. This writer goes to he heart of the issue and does it in a very unbiased way.

    Really? (#129849)
    by Hank Rand on December 6, 2008 at 9:44 PM
    “What difference does it make to the future of this country whether Obama was born on US soil? Advocates of this destructive campaign will argue that the Constitutional principle regarding the qualifications for President trumps all others. But how viable will our Constitution be if 5 Supreme Court justices should decide to void 64 million ballots?”

    A proponent of the reality that there is an outstanding question that exists relating to Barack Obama’s natural born citizenship (not that I have an answer, but rather simply that no answer has been given), my personal opinion is that this has less to do with the merit of this particular Constitutional law…and more to do with the character and integrity of a man who may have gone to such great lengths to, knowingly, break it. And in that course of action, our entire country (not just those who didn’t vote for him) and our most coveted process of Democracy (our vote), were defrauded.

    If he’s found to be ineligible per the Constitution, proving he knowingly and willfully defrauded our people and process, it won’t be the Justices who will have disenfranchised 64 million voters. It’s Barack Obama. How many times are you prepared to claim “you fell down the stairs” for this man? I was an initial supporter. I started seeing very real and very questionable issues raised about the nature of his past associations, and the laughable explanations he would give…and I was sure it would hurt him in the press and among supporters. But what did I see? The press and most supporters to engrossed in their partisanship to care. In fact, the more reasonable questions came up about him…the harder the press and the 64 million that same press brainwashed, drove to the hoop for him. As I stood back watching this, again, as an initial supporter of his, even making phone calls on his behalf…I realized what I was seeing, was nothing short of WEIRD. Just, plain, weird.

    And I thought this birth certificate issue (check that, “Certificate of Live Birth” issue…as opposed to “Certification of Live Birth”) was cleared up a long time ago. I thought there was no way the DNC would have been capable of such a gross oversight. Then the court cases came up, and nothing was done to quell the question. What finally landed me understanding that something is not right, is when Chiyome Fukino, Director of Health for Hawaii, released the statement about his birth. That statement actually did more harm than good, and it only demonstrated further how moronic far too many public officials and people in the media and governing bodies, think Americans are.

    Sure, America has it’s slew of idiots. And sure, the aisle that questions Barack Obama’s natural born and/or properly maintained citizenship statuses has it’s smattering of fringe wingnuts. But just because one contingent of people happen to be on board, doesn’t nullify the fact that the question is still outstanding. I hear the same 5 refutations over, and over, and over. “He posted his birth certificate on his website”, “Factcheck proved it”, “The state of Hawaii released a statement saying he was born there”, “There was a birth announcement in a Hawaiian newspaper”, “Judges meritoriously threw it out as ‘frivolous’”; and while each of those statements hold an element of truth, they’re also easily debunked. And “truth” is objective. There is no debunking it. We should be able to move past this on to more subjective and productive lines of communication…with all the dissent we’re accustomed to…forging, like competition, improvement. But here we are. And one man can answer this objective question. And sure, not everyone will get on board if he were to release his college records and actual Certificate of Live Birth (as opposed to the factually less credible, more easily attained and more easily forged “Certification” - which bears no corroborating evidence like the hospital or doctor’s name)…but many would get on board. Coming off a platform of transparency, directly in to a promised pursuit for unity…why leave so many of us divided on what is a simple and objectively debunked question? If the Certification is authentic, the it’s more credible parent - the Certificate, exists. But rather than produce it, he has fought those requests so fiercely that he’s allowed the same requests to land in court rooms…where he continues to fight them. Why? So rather than quell the reasonable, objective and easily answered outstanding question…he opts non disclosure. I wrote somewhere else that the production of Certificate of Live Birth is a very small price t pay for unity. And yet, here we are. And Barack Obama, and Barack Obama only, is responsible for that. I am certain of that beyond any reasonable doubt, because Barack Obama, and Barack Obama only, can quell it…with an actual Certificate of Live Birth, and he has watched requests transition to court cases, and still refuses. So as a first order of business, in a promised pursuit for unity, he leaves us divided, on what should be a very simple, very objective, very basic matter. Who among us can applaud that? “I do, Hank. Because you’re all just whackjobs.” That’s all well and good if that’s your opinion. My brother said to me, “Yeah but if we pull him out, we’re going to look corrupt to the rest of the world.” I replied, “I’d rather look corrupt and not be it, than be corrupt and not look it.” So goes my position on being called a whackjob, for maintaining through nothing more than logic and fact, that there is a still outstanding question regarding Barack Obama’s natural born and properly maintained citizenship statuses. I’d rather be called a whackjob and stand by truth, than submit to mistruths and be called sound.

    I didn’t hear any of the 5 standard press talking points in your piece, which leads me to believe the transition I anticipated is occurring. That is, virtually all of supporters (and I don’t know if you were one prior to November 4th or not), will go from, “He didn’t commit fraud. He is a natural born citizen”, to “So what if he committed fraud. So what if he isn’t a natural born citizen.” I’ve challenged others, staunch supporters in fact, as to whether or not they’d concede a gross misstep in character and judgement, and support his being held accountable for that, if he did commit this fraud. They’ve uniformly claimed they would. This article, blog, whatever it is…demonstrates the first piece I’ve actually seen that goes out of it’s way to say, “No. I wouldn’t. Barack Obama can lie, cheat and steal all he wants. And if he gets held accountable for it, it’s the fault of the Justices…because Barack Obama himself, is simply incapable of wrongdoing.”

    Running that red light you sit at, day after day, when no one is looking, is pretty harmless too. But you know it’s wrong. This man, if not a natural born and properly maintained citizen of the United States, will have knowingly and willfully cheated our entire country, and more critical than that - our absolutely, inherently, unquestionably most coveted process of democracy - in what can only be articulated as a relentless pursuit for unapologetic, integrity-free, and division-inducing pursuit for power.Link.

    The Intellectual Redneck

  4. Because it matters Says:
    January 23rd, 2009 at 7:57 am

    […] filed under political. Date: January 23, 2009, 7:46 am | No Comments » 06  Dec Obama eligibility issue - dawn of New World Order? Because I was afraid that I would appear as a conspiracy theory nut, I have hesitated to produce […]

  5. Because it matters Says:
    January 23rd, 2009 at 7:57 am

    […] filed under political. Date: January 23, 2009, 7:46 am | No Comments » 06  Dec Obama eligibility issue - dawn of New World Order? Because I was afraid that I would appear as a conspiracy theory nut, I have hesitated to produce […]

  6. AtkinsonLydia21 Says:
    May 22nd, 2010 at 7:16 am

    It is understandable that money makes us autonomous. But what to do when someone doesn’t have money? The one way is to receive the business loans and just small business loan.

  7. mortgage loans Says:
    January 18th, 2011 at 3:12 pm

    Don’t you recognize that it is correct time to receive the home loans, which can make your dreams come true.

Your input counts! Please make this site more interesting by leaving your comments, questions, blurb, etc. Thank you!

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation

Your comment or question

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. However, unless you use foul language or include too many links, it should be not be put in the moderation queue.